{"id":104394,"date":"2026-09-23T11:57:45","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T11:57:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newonclusivstg.wpengine.com\/?p=104394"},"modified":"2026-09-23T12:26:13","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T12:26:13","slug":"london-fashion-week-ss27-burberry-still-first-the-rest-of-london-reordered","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/resources\/blog\/london-fashion-week-ss27-burberry-still-first-the-rest-of-london-reordered\/","title":{"rendered":"London Fashion Week SS27: Burberry Still First. The Rest of London Reordered."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Inside London Fashion Week SS27\u2019s 608,000-mention split<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

How Thai, Japanese, Taiwanese and Chinese star power captured social media, how a British front row<\/em> and a high-street debut captured the newspapers, and what the gap between those two boards means<\/em> after New York.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bright, Koji Mukai and Shuhua took the feed. Kelly Osbourne, Lila Moss and Marks & Spencer took the papers. Burberry led both boards, and no longer owned the week by itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After our analysis of NYFW SS27<\/a> and of London\u2019s own SS26 and FW26 editions<\/a>, we turn to the September week on home turf. Official London Fashion Week SS27<\/a> ran 17\u201321 September 2026. Onclusive recorded more than 608,000 social mentions, 123.2 million reach and 358,000 authors between 16 and 22 September, with a spike at 7.00PM on the 21st, Burberry at Chelsea College of Arts. Mainstream coverage ran to 5,709 mentions and an advertising value equivalency of 284.7 million. The clothes moved. The two Onclusive boards did not describe the same evening.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This season did not overturn the thesis we published after New York but relocated it. Asian entertainment stars remain the primary engine of social volume. What London added is a commercial week that the BFC can measure in buyer badges, 47 catwalk shows, 23 presentations, 10 digital activations, 53 evening events, and a news week organised around McQueen\u2019s first London show in 25 years, Mulberry\u2019s runway return under Christopher Kane, and Marks & Spencer\u2019s first official catwalk, celebrating 100 years of fashion. None of those three houses sits where Burberry <\/a>sits on social.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

All figures below cover 16\u201322 September 2026 and are sourced from Onclusive Social<\/a> and Onclusive Monitor<\/a>, unless noted. Brand share of voice is calculated among 134 houses; celebrity share of voice among 184 personalities measured for the window.<\/em>
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Key takeaways from London Fashion Week SS27<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. Burberry still owns social, but the monopoly loosened. <\/strong>The house took 55.2% of brand social SOV among 134 labels, first, and not close, but below 86.94% in SS26 and 91.10% in FW26. H&M (17.2%) and McQueen\u2019s London return (6.8%) built a second and third pillar that did not exist at that scale a year ago.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. The social peak was a Burberry peak. <\/strong>608,000 social mentions, 123.2 million reach and 358,000 authors were recorded between 16 and 22 September. The spike landed at 7.00PM on 21 September, as Daniel Lee showed at Chelsea College of Arts.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Social and news still do not describe the same week. <\/strong>Burberry is first on both boards, but the rest of the field reorders. H&M is second on social (17.2%) and fifth in digital news (4.5%). Marks & Spencer is sixth on social (1.3%) and third in news (7.5%). McQueen is third on social (6.8%) and second in news (7.7%).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Bright, Koji Mukai and Shuhua own social; Kelly Osbourne and Lila Moss own the papers. <\/strong>Bright Vachirawit took 29.06% of celebrity social SOV, Koji Mukai 27.90%, Shuhua 17.20%. None of those three appear in the digital-news top 20. Kelly Osbourne (3.43%) and Lila Moss (3.42%) lead the press list.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Seungmin was not in the room. <\/strong>Stray Kids\u2019 Seungmin led celebrity social SOV at LFW SS26<\/a> (40.53%) and FW26 (43.00%). He does not appear in the SS27 social or news top 20. The Burberry Asia bloc this season was Bright, Koji Mukai, Shuhua, Zhang Jingyi and Wu Lei, with Kim Min-ha and Son Suk-ku also documented on the Chelsea College front row, outside the measured top 20.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. Hybrid hashtags still beat the event tag. <\/strong>#burberry (194,303) outran #lfw (8,964) and #londonfashionweek (6,927) combined. Person \u00d7 house tags , #burberryxbright (49,742), #burberryxkojimukai (16,688), #hmthailandxmile (14,493), #shuhuaxburberryss27 (6,387), are how audiences entered the week.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  7. Off-calendar in London was a party layer, not a Ralph Lauren. <\/strong>Kim Kardashian\u2019s Skims Regent Street flagship (19 September) and Kate Moss\u2019s KMA \u00d7 Perfect evening at Home House (20 September) sit off the BFC runway calendar. They register in news (2.60% and 2.20%) far more than on social.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  8. The BFC called it a commercial week. <\/strong>Accredited buyer attendance was up 19% year-on-year; international buyers were up 41%. That is a different dashboard from social SOV. The two can rise together without describing the same winners.

    <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    The London Fashion Week SS27 by the numbers<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Social media<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    608,000 mentions<\/strong> were recorded between 16 and 22 September, produced by 358,000 authors and reaching an estimated 123.2 million.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The social peak<\/strong> landed at 7.00PM on 21 September. One show explains it: Burberry Summer 2027 at Chelsea College of Arts, with Central Cee on the runway and a front row that mixed British talent (Jonathan Bailey, Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, Jason Statham, Romeo Beckham, Skepta, Joe Locke) with Burberry\u2019s Asian ambassador corps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Mainstream media<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    5,709 mention<\/strong>s ran across digital, print, television, radio and podcasts. The peak also landed on 21 September. The AVE<\/strong>, Advertising value equivalency for the window is 284.7 million. ((i.e., the monetary value of media coverage if purchased as advertising)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The social week was a fandom story organised around Burberry and H&M. The news week was a British front-row and high-street story, McQueen\u2019s return after 25 years, Marks & Spencer\u2019s first official LFW catwalk, Natasha Zinko\u2019s OnlyFans-sponsored show, with Burberry still first, but no longer alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    What the industry called a win<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    FashionNetwork<\/a> reported the BFC\u2019s close-of-week statement on 21 September. The season, the Council said, delivered \u201crenewed international and commercial momentum, with accredited buyer attendance up 19% year-on-year and accredited international buyer attendance increasing 41%.\u201d David Thielebeule, fashion director of Bloomingdale\u2019s, called London \u201ca joy this season\u201d and pointed to \u201cthe originality, independent thinking and openness to new ideas that continue to set London apart.\u201d David Dessureault of Chalhoub Group said brands seen in London were now \u201con our radar, with real potential to bring to Dubai and the wider GCC.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Early BFC-commissioned research published with the close found 89% of London adults aware of London Fashion Week, more than 80% of 18\u201324-year-olds engaged with it, and 71% engagement among Londoners from Global Majority backgrounds. That is a city-level awareness number. It is not a substitute for the 608,000 social mentions measured in this window, which still peak at 19:00 on the 21st, Burberry\u2019s slot, rather than across the buyer circuit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Laura Weir, appointed BFC chief executive in April 2025, had framed the September schedule around returns: McQueen with Se\u00e1n McGirr at Lincoln\u2019s Inn Chapel, Mulberry with Christopher Kane\u2019s first collection for the house, and a high-street debut for Marks & Spencer. H&M opened the week with Nick Knight and SHOWstudio. Those are the commercial facts. They explain why McQueen is second in digital-news brand SOV (7.7%) and Marks & Spencer is third (7.5%). They do not explain why Burberry still holds 55.2% of brand social conversation, or why Bright, Koji Mukai and Shuhua hold 74.16% of celebrity social SOV.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n \n

    <\/div>\n \n
    \n
    \n
    \n\n
    \n 29.06% <\/div>\n \n
    Bright Vachirawit \u0e44\u0e1a\u0e23\u0e4c\u0e17\u0e27\u0e0a\u0e34\u0e23\u0e27\u0e34\u0e0a\u0e0d\u0e4c<\/div>\n \n
    <\/div>\n\n
    \n

    Burberry<\/span><\/p>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n

    \n\n
    \n 27.90% <\/div>\n \n
    Koji Mukai \u5411\u4e95\u5eb7\u4e8c<\/div>\n \n
    <\/div>\n\n
    \n

    Burberry<\/span><\/p>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n

    \n\n
    \n 17.20% <\/div>\n \n
    Shuhua (i-dle) \u53f6\u8212\u534e<\/div>\n \n
    <\/div>\n\n
    \n

    Burberry<\/span><\/p>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n\n

    <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Brand power: social versus digital news<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Onclusive scored 134 houses in the 16\u201322 September window. Burberry is first on social (55.2%) and first in digital news (9.1%). Under that single name the week divides. H&M is second on social at 17.2% and fifth in news at 4.5%. Marks & Spencer is sixth on social at 1.3% and third in news at 7.5%.McQueen is third on social (6.8%) and second in news (7.7%). First place is shared. Everything under it is not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Social media, top 15 of 134 brands<\/strong>. London Fashion Week SS27 <\/em>
    <\/h3>\n\n\n\n
    Rank<\/strong><\/td>Brand<\/strong><\/td>Social SOV  | <\/strong>Data by Onclusive.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
    1<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>55.2%<\/td><\/tr>
    2<\/strong><\/td>H&M<\/td>17.2%<\/td><\/tr>
    3<\/strong><\/td>McQueen<\/td>6.8%<\/td><\/tr>
    4<\/strong><\/td>Di Petsa<\/td>4.9%<\/td><\/tr>
    5<\/strong><\/td>TOGA<\/td>3.1%<\/td><\/tr>
    6<\/strong><\/td>Marks & Spencer<\/td>1.3%<\/td><\/tr>
    7<\/strong><\/td>Mulberry by Christopher Kane<\/td>0.9%<\/td><\/tr>
    8<\/strong><\/td>Keburia<\/td>0.7%<\/td><\/tr>
    9<\/strong><\/td>Labrum<\/td>0.7%<\/td><\/tr>
    10<\/strong><\/td>Bora Aksu<\/td>0.7%<\/td><\/tr>
    11<\/strong><\/td>Natasha Zinko<\/td>0.6%<\/td><\/tr>
    12<\/strong><\/td>Erdem<\/td>0.5%<\/td><\/tr>
    13<\/strong><\/td>Mithridate<\/td>0.5%<\/td><\/tr>
    14<\/strong><\/td>Richard Quinn<\/td>0.4%<\/td><\/tr>
    15<\/strong><\/td>Simone Rocha<\/td>0.3%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

    Burberry and H&M together hold 72.4% of brand social conversation. Add McQueen and the top three hold 79.2%. Everyone from Marks & Spencer down is fighting over the remaining fifth. Di Petsa (4.9%) and TOGA (3.1%) are the two independent-scale houses that clear three percent , both of them with a single, measurable guest (Leigh-Anne Pinnock on the Di Petsa runway; Yves (formerly of Loona) at TOGA, Somerset House, 19 September).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Compared with a year ago, the concentration is less extreme. Burberry\u2019s social SOV was 86.94% among 79 brands in SS26 and 91.10% among 114 brands in FW26. The house is still the conversation. It is no longer the only conversation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Digital news, top 15 of 134 brands.<\/strong> London Fashion Week SS27 <\/em>
    <\/h3>\n\n\n\n
    Rank<\/strong><\/td>Brand<\/strong><\/td>Digital-news SOV | <\/strong>Data by Onclusive.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
    1<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>9.1%<\/td><\/tr>
    2<\/strong><\/td>McQueen<\/td>7.7%<\/td><\/tr>
    3<\/strong><\/td>Marks & Spencer<\/td>7.5%<\/td><\/tr>
    4<\/strong><\/td>Mulberry by Christopher Kane<\/td>5.9%<\/td><\/tr>
    5<\/strong><\/td>H&M<\/td>4.5%<\/td><\/tr>
    6<\/strong><\/td>Erdem<\/td>3.6%<\/td><\/tr>
    7<\/strong><\/td>Simone Rocha<\/td>3.4%<\/td><\/tr>
    8<\/strong><\/td>Natasha Zinko<\/td>2.8%<\/td><\/tr>
    9<\/strong><\/td>Harris Reed<\/td>2.3%<\/td><\/tr>
    10<\/strong><\/td>Chopova Lowena<\/td>2.0%<\/td><\/tr>
    11<\/strong><\/td>Roksanda<\/td>2.0%<\/td><\/tr>
    12<\/strong><\/td>Di Petsa<\/td>1.9%<\/td><\/tr>
    13<\/strong><\/td>Barbour<\/td>1.7%<\/td><\/tr>
    14<\/strong><\/td>Edeline Lee<\/td>1.6%<\/td><\/tr>
    15<\/strong><\/td>Aaron Esh<\/td>1.4%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

    In newsrooms the week reorders under Burberry. McQueen\u2019s first London show in 25 years, under Se\u00e1n McGirr, is second. Marks & Spencer\u2019s first official LFW catwalk, a see-now-buy-now show at the Design Museum on 18 September, with Joan Collins in the front row and Karen Elson, Jodie Kidd, Erin O\u2019Connor and Lennon Gallagher on the runway,  is third, at 7.5%. Mulberry\u2019s debut under Christopher Kane is fourth. H&M, second on social, falls to fifth. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Six houses make the news top 15 and miss the social top 15: Harris Reed, Chopova Lowena, Roksanda, Barbour, Edeline Lee, Aaron Esh. Four do the reverse: TOGA, Keburia, Labrum, Bora Aksu. Social SOV in this extract is a measure of who arrived with an already-organised audience. News SOV is a measure of who editors put in a frame. Treating either table as the week is how a house concludes it won while the other half of the industry saw someone else.

    <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    184 names. Seven never made the papers.<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Onclusive measured 184 celebrities and ambassadors. Ranked by social SOV, the top seven are Bright Vachirawit (29.06%), Koji Mukai (27.90%), Shuhua (17.20%), Mile Phakphum (14.87%), Zhang Jingyi (3.59%), Yves (1.37%) and Wu Lei (1.30%). None of those seven appear in the digital-news top 20.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Ranked by news SOV, the list opens with Kelly Osbourne (3.43%) and Lila Moss (3.42%), then a Marks & Spencer bloc, Joan Collins, Karen Elson, Jodie Kidd, and two off-calendar names, Kim Kardashian and Kate Moss. The overlap between the two top twenties is thin: Katie Price, Leigh-Anne Pinnock, Jonathan Bailey, Alex Consani, Labrinth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Social media, top 20 of 184<\/strong>. London Fashion Week SS27 <\/em><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    London Fashion Week SS27 \/ all languages, including Chinese (traditional and simplified), Thai, Korean and Tagalog. Data by Onclusive.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Celebrity<\/strong><\/td>Primary house \/ Brand<\/strong><\/td>Role<\/strong><\/td>Social SOV | <\/strong>Data by Onclusive.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
    Bright Vachirawit \/ \u0e44\u0e1a\u0e23\u0e4c\u0e17\u0e27\u0e0a\u0e34\u0e23\u0e27\u0e34\u0e0a\u0e0d\u0e4c<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row + ambassador<\/td>29.06%<\/td><\/tr>
    Koji Mukai \/ \u5411\u4e95\u5eb7\u4e8c<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row + ambassador<\/td>27.90%<\/td><\/tr>
    Shuhua \/ \u53f6\u8212\u534e (i-dle)<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row + ambassador<\/td>17.20%<\/td><\/tr>
    Mile Phakphum \/ \u0e21\u0e32\u0e22 \u0e20\u0e32\u0e04\u0e20\u0e39\u0e21\u0e34<\/strong><\/td>H&M<\/td>Front row \/ Thailand activation<\/td>14.87%<\/td><\/tr>
    Zhang Jingyi \/ \u5f20\u5a67\u4eea<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row + ambassador<\/td>3.59%<\/td><\/tr>
    Yves \/ \uc774\ube0c (Ha Sooyoung)<\/strong><\/td>Toga \/ Natasha Zinko \/ Keburia \/  Bora Aksu<\/td>Front row<\/td>1.37%<\/td><\/tr>
    Wu Lei \/ Leo Wu \/ \u5434\u78ca<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row + ambassador<\/td>1.30%<\/td><\/tr>
    Tems<\/strong><\/td>H&M \/ Burberry \/ Skims<\/td>Front row + party<\/td>0.33%<\/td><\/tr>
    Katie Price<\/strong><\/td>Natasha Zinko<\/td>Runway<\/td>0.33%<\/td><\/tr>
    Leigh-Anne Pinnock<\/strong><\/td>Di Petsa<\/td>Runway<\/td>0.29%<\/td><\/tr>
    Jonathan Bailey<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row<\/td>0.27%<\/td><\/tr>
    Kelly Osbourne<\/strong><\/td>Natasha Zinko<\/td>Runway<\/td>0.20%<\/td><\/tr>
    Sophie Thatcher<\/strong><\/td>McQueen<\/td>Front row<\/td>0.18%<\/td><\/tr>
    Joe Locke<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row<\/td>0.15%<\/td><\/tr>
    Emilia Clarke<\/strong><\/td>McQueen<\/td>Front row<\/td>0.11%<\/td><\/tr>
    Skepta<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row<\/td>0.10%<\/td><\/tr>
    Kim Kardashian<\/strong><\/td>Skims *<\/td>Flagship party<\/td>0.10%<\/td><\/tr>
    Alex Consani<\/strong><\/td>H&M<\/td>Runway \/ film<\/td>0.09%<\/td><\/tr>
    Labrinth<\/strong><\/td>H&M<\/td>Front row<\/td>0.09%<\/td><\/tr>
    Cruz Beckham<\/strong><\/td>H&M<\/td>Front row<\/td>0.09%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

    * Off-calendar.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Bright, Koji Mukai and Shuhua together account for 74.16% of measured celebrity social conversation. Add Zhang Jingyi and Wu Lei and Burberry\u2019s five named Asian ambassadors in the top 20 hold 79.05%. Mile Phakphum at H&M (14.87%) is the only non-Burberry name in the top five. Yves at TOGA (1.37%) is the only other house in the top seven.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The British names that filled Vogue UK\u2019s 87-picture LFW gallery, Jonathan Bailey, Joe Locke, Skepta, Emilia Clarke, Sophie Thatcher live in the last dozen rows of the social board. Kim Kardashian\u2019s 0.10% is a Skims Regent Street opening on 19 September, not a BFC front row.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Kim Min-ha and Son Suk-ku, both Burberry ambassadors, were documented at Chelsea College of Arts on 21 September. They do not appear in this top 20. Absence from a share-of-voice extract is not absence from the room.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n

    A note on methodology:<\/em> SOV<\/em><\/a> and EMV (earned media value) are two fundamentally different ways of measuring the impact of ambassadors and celebrities. SOV measures conversation dominance, while EMV assigns monetary value to media exposure. Both are valuable but answer different questions. Asian Entertainment and Culture channel posted an hour-long video explaining the<\/em> differences between SOV and EMV (<\/em><\/a>Starting at 7 min 30 sec). <\/em>
    <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

    Digital news, top 20 of 184<\/strong>. London Fashion Week SS27 <\/em><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    London Fashion Week SS27 \/ all languages, including Chinese (traditional and simplified), Thai, Korean and Tagalog. Data by Onclusive.<\/em>
    <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Celebrity<\/strong><\/td>Primary house \/ Brand<\/strong><\/td>Role<\/strong><\/td>News SOV | <\/strong>Data by Onclusive.<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
    Kelly Osbourne<\/strong><\/td>Natasha Zinko<\/td>Runway<\/td>3.43%<\/td><\/tr>
    Lila Moss<\/strong><\/td>Burberry \/ McQueen \/ KMA<\/td>Front row + party<\/td>3.42%<\/td><\/tr>
    Joan Collins<\/strong><\/td>Marks & Spencer<\/td>Front row<\/td>3.10%<\/td><\/tr>
    Karen Elson<\/strong><\/td>Marks & Spencer<\/td>Runway<\/td>2.80%<\/td><\/tr>
    Kim Kardashian<\/strong><\/td>Skims *<\/td>Flagship party<\/td>2.60%<\/td><\/tr>
    Katie Price<\/strong><\/td>Natasha Zinko<\/td>Runway<\/td>2.50%<\/td><\/tr>
    Jodie Kidd<\/strong><\/td>Marks & Spencer<\/td>Runway<\/td>2.20%<\/td><\/tr>
    Kate Moss<\/strong><\/td>KMA \u00d7 Perfect *<\/td>Party, Home House<\/td>2.20%<\/td><\/tr>
    Rosie Huntington-Whiteley<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row<\/td>2.10%<\/td><\/tr>
    Leigh-Anne Pinnock<\/strong><\/td>Di Petsa<\/td>Runway<\/td>2.00%<\/td><\/tr>
    Erin O\u2019Connor<\/strong><\/td>M&S \/ Burberry<\/td>Runway + front row<\/td>2.00%<\/td><\/tr>
    Drea de Matteo<\/strong><\/td>Natasha Zinko<\/td>Runway<\/td>1.90%<\/td><\/tr>
    Jason Statham<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row<\/td>1.80%<\/td><\/tr>
    Alexa Chung<\/strong><\/td>McQueen<\/td>Front row<\/td>1.70%<\/td><\/tr>
    Alex Consani<\/strong><\/td>H&M<\/td>Runway \/ film<\/td>1.70%<\/td><\/tr>
    Jonathan Bailey<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row<\/td>1.70%<\/td><\/tr>
    Central Cee<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Runway debut<\/td>1.60%<\/td><\/tr>
    Labrinth<\/strong><\/td>H&M<\/td>Front row<\/td>1.60%<\/td><\/tr>
    Romeo Beckham<\/strong><\/td>Burberry<\/td>Front row<\/td>1.50%<\/td><\/tr>
    Lennon Gallagher<\/strong><\/td>Marks & Spencer<\/td>Runway<\/td>1.50%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

    * Off-calendar.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Kelly Osbourne walking Natasha Zinko\u2019s OnlyFans-sponsored \u201cPay Per View\u201d show on 18 September is the week\u2019s most-covered single celebrity in digital news, at 3.43%. Lila Moss, McQueen on the 20th, Burberry on the 21st, and her mother\u2019s KMA anniversary the same Sunday, is second, at 3.42%.
    Then the Marks & Spencer bloc: Joan Collins in the front row (3.10%), Karen Elson (2.80%), Jodie Kidd (2.20%) and Lennon Gallagher (1.50%) on the runway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \"Yves
    Yves Instagram Story @ London Fashion Week SS27, Bora Aksu Show<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n


    Kim Kardashian at 2.60% and Kate Moss at 2.20% are off-calendar. Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, Jason Statham, Jonathan Bailey, Central Cee and Romeo Beckham are the Burberry names who clear the news board. Bright, Koji Mukai, Shuhua, Mile Phakphum, Zhang Jingyi, Yves and Wu Lei, the “social giants”, do not appear in the news top 20 at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    That inversion is the London version<\/strong> of a finding we published after New York. Lingling Kwong owned NYFW social and was absent from the news top 20; Love Pattranite owned the papers from an off-calendar Coach seat. In London the social giants are again APAC ambassadors. The papers are again a Western seating chart, plus two off-calendar parties. No London name this season repeated Love Pattranite\u2019s double: high on both boards.

    <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n \n

    \n\n \n
    \n \"New\n <\/div>\n \n \n
    \n\n

    Onclusive Social uses AI Sentinel <\/h3>\n \n

    to monitor social media activity in real-time, predicting and alerting you to sudden surges in mentions related to any topic.
    \r\nBe the first to know about new trends, crises, or buzz; empowering you to respond swiftly and effectively.<\/p>\n \n

    \n \n Arrange a demo <\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n\n

    Hashtag intelligence for London Fashion Week SS27 <\/em>: What outran #lfw<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    In this extract the event tags are small. #lfw has 8,964 mentions. #londonfashionweek has 6,927. #burberry has 194,303. The analytics AI excludes hashtags massively generated by bot accounts. Languages include Chinese (traditional and simplified), Thai, Korean and Tagalog<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Hashtag<\/strong><\/td>Mentions<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
    #burberry<\/strong><\/td>194,303<\/td><\/tr>
    #\u5411\u4e95\u5eb7\u4e8c (Koji Mukai)<\/strong><\/td>93,731<\/td><\/tr>
    #bbrightvc<\/strong><\/td>67,993<\/td><\/tr>
    #shuhua<\/strong><\/td>56,071<\/td><\/tr>
    #milephakphum<\/strong><\/td>52,388<\/td><\/tr>
    #burberryxbright<\/strong><\/td>49,742<\/td><\/tr>
    #kojimukai<\/strong><\/td>41,739<\/td><\/tr>
    #burberryss27xbright<\/strong><\/td>36,721<\/td><\/tr>
    #\u0e21\u0e32\u0e22\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04\u0e20\u0e39\u0e21\u0e34 (Mile Phakphum)<\/strong><\/td>34,485<\/td><\/tr>
    #burberryxkojimukai<\/strong><\/td>16,688<\/td><\/tr>
    #\uc288\ud654 (Shuhua)<\/strong><\/td>15,111<\/td><\/tr>
    #hmthailandxmile<\/strong><\/td>14,493<\/td><\/tr>
    #zhangjingyi<\/strong><\/td>8,980<\/td><\/tr>
    #lfw<\/strong><\/td>8,964<\/td><\/tr>
    #\u8212\u83ef (Shuhua)<\/strong><\/td>8,843<\/td><\/tr>
    #hm<\/strong><\/td>8,490<\/td><\/tr>
    #idle<\/strong><\/td>7,904<\/td><\/tr>
    #londonfashionweek<\/strong><\/td>6,927<\/td><\/tr>
    #shuhuaxburberryss27<\/strong><\/td>6,387<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n


    Where the mentions actually sat:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Koji Mukai is the largest person-tag cluster in the file: #\u5411\u4e95\u5eb7\u4e8c at 93,731 and #kojimukai at 41,739, plus the hybrid #burberryxkojimukai at 16,688. Bright is the largest hybrid cluster: #bbrightvc 67,993, #burberryxbright 49,742, #burberryss27xbright 36,721. Add those three Bright tags and you already exceed #lfw by an order of magnitude.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Shuhua splits across four strings that would look like four mid-size stories if left ungrouped: #shuhua 56,071, #\uc288\ud654 15,111, #\u8212\u83ef 8,843, #shuhuaxburberryss27 6,387. Mile Phakphum is the only non-Burberry cluster of this size, #milephakphum 52,388, #\u0e21\u0e32\u0e22\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04\u0e20\u0e21  34,485, #hmthailandxmile 14,493, which is why H&M is the only house besides Burberry above 15% of brand social SOV.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    #idle (7,904) sits next to Shuhua because i-dle\u2019s fandom organised around her Chelsea College seat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Used without a brand or a city it will ingest every other i-dle conversation in the window. #hm (8,490) has the same problem at house scale. Pair both, or the dashboard reports a group and a retailer instead of a front-row moment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    #zhangjingyi (8,980) already outruns #lfw (8,964) on its own. A listening brief that starts with the event umbrella and adds people later will invert the week: it will treat the close as a sideshow of the calendar, when the calendar was the sideshow of the close.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \"map
    Excerpt from the interactive map of influential accounts at London Fashion Week SS27. Data visualization created by our  social media monitoring platform<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

    <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The London Fashion Week SS27 off-calendar layer<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The British Fashion Council\u2019s official schedule opened on Thursday 17 September and closed on Monday 21 September with Burberry. Unlike New York, the house that won both London boards sat on the official calendar. The off-calendar problem in London this season is smaller, and it is social-to-news rather than schedule-to-schedule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Two measured moments sit outside the BFC runway PDF and still moved the celebrity news board:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    • Kim Kardashian at the Skims Regent Street flagship party on 19 September, first international standalone store, covered by Vogue. News SOV 2.60%; social SOV 0.10%. Tems and Central Cee were also in that room before (and after) their official-week appearances.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Kate Moss at the KMA \u00d7 Perfect tenth-anniversary evening, Home House, 20 September, with Lila Moss. News SOV 2.20%. Kate Moss does not appear in the social top 20.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      The industry term is off-calendar (or off-schedule), not \u201coff agenda.\u201d The distinction matters for measurement. A window that starts on 17 September still captures Burberry. A window that ignores 19\u201320 September parties will undercount Kim Kardashian and Kate Moss in news, and will miss why Lila Moss sits second on that board.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      What London did not have, this September, is a Ralph Lauren: an off-calendar house that wins the newspapers while barely registering on social. Burberry won both boards from inside the official close.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      London Fashion Week SS27: <\/em>What changed from SS26 and FW26<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
      Metric<\/strong><\/td>SS26 (Sep 2025)<\/strong><\/td>FW26 (Feb 2026)<\/strong><\/td>SS27 (Sep 2026)<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
      Social mentions<\/strong><\/td>517,000<\/td>1.30 million<\/td>608,000<\/td><\/tr>
      People talking<\/strong><\/td>305,000<\/td>850,000<\/td>358,000<\/td><\/tr>
      Social reach<\/strong><\/td>126.1 million<\/td>124.3 million<\/td>123.2 million<\/td><\/tr>
      Mainstream mentions<\/strong><\/td>5,861<\/td>10,588<\/td>5,709<\/td><\/tr>
      Burberry social brand SOV<\/strong><\/td>86.94%<\/td>91.10%<\/td>55.2%<\/td><\/tr>
      Primary Burberry social driver<\/strong><\/td>Seungmin<\/td>Seungmin \/ Bright \/ YoonA<\/td>Bright \/ Koji \/ Shuhua<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

      SS26 and FW26 figures from Onclusive\u2019s prior London Fashion Week analyses. SS27: Onclusive Social and Monitor, 16\u201322 September 2026.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      September remains smaller than February on raw social volume, as it did a year ago, 608,000 mentions against February\u2019s 1.30 million. Reach is stable across all three seasons (126.1 \/ 124.3 \/ 123.2 million). Mainstream mentions in SS27 (5,709) sit with SS26 (5,861), well below February\u2019s 10,588, which included King Charles III at Tolu Coker.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The structural change is Burberry\u2019s social share. The house went from a near-monopoly (86.94%, then 91.10%) to 55.2%. That is still first by a wide margin. It is no longer a closed system. H&M\u2019s 17.2%, Mile Phakphum, Labrinth, Cruz Beckham, Tems, Alex Consani, and McQueen\u2019s 6.8% on a 25-year homecoming are the two new pillars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The other change is the missing name. Seungmin generated 40.53% of celebrity social SOV in SS26 and 43.00% in FW26. He was not on the Burberry SS27 front row. Fan tags from prior seasons still circulated; they did not put him on this season\u2019s measured leaderboard. YoonA, second-wave FW26, is likewise absent from the SS27 top 20. Burberry rotated the faces and kept the architecture: Thai, Japanese, Taiwanese and Chinese ambassadors, closing-night slot, hybrid hashtags.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      London Fashion Week SS27: Strategic implications<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      For PR and communications<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      A gallery and news recap will put Jonathan Bailey and Rosie Huntington-Whiteley on the news leaderboard. It will not put them on the social one. The social leaderboard in London is still built by guests whose fans already have a tagging grammar (Name \u00d7 House, often in two scripts). Burberry remains the case study. H&M showed that a second house can rent the same machine, #hmthailandxmile is the proof, without catching Burberry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      For competitive intelligence<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Read the two SOV tables together every season. A house that jumps on social and stays mid-table in news has rented a fandom (TOGA, Di Petsa). A house that jumps in news and stays small on social has rented a front row or a first-time narrative (Marks & Spencer, Mulberry, Harris Reed). Only Burberry held both boards at scale. H&M came closest to doing both.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      For social listening teams<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Configure Thai, Japanese, Korean and Chinese scripts before the week starts. Collapse Koji, Shuhua and Mile variants into clusters or you will report each of them as three mid-size tags instead of one large conversation. Do not drop #burberry from a celebrity query either, and do not drop #seungminxburberry from a negative check simply because he was not in the building. Last season\u2019s tags persist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      For casting<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Love Pattranite remains the brief we wrote in New York: an APAC name who also clears English-language picture desks. London SS27 did not produce that double. Bright, Koji and Shuhua maximised social and vanished from the news top 20. Kelly Osbourne, Joan Collins and Lila Moss maximised the clip and barely registered on social. The scarce profile is still the one who can sit on both boards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      As the calendar moves again to Milan and Paris, the question is no longer whether the Asian celebrity effect \u201cworks\u201d because it works on social, every London season it is funded. The question SS27 adds is whether a house can afford to win only that board , and whether anyone except Burberry can win both. H&M took a visible second. Marks & Spencer and McQueen took the papers. Bright, Koji Mukai and Shuhua took the feed. That is the competitive map leaving London.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n

      About the London Fashion Week SS27 data
      <\/strong>Data sourced from Onclusive Social and Onclusive Monitor, 16\u201322 September 2026. Show reporting cross-checked with the BFC schedule, Vogue UK, WWD, the Evening Standard, Dazed, Just Jared, Getty Images, Hello!, Marie Claire and house releases, FashionNetwork (21 September 2026), and BFC schedule notes.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

      The cover image was generated by a generative AI tool for illustrative purposes.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

      <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Inside London Fashion Week SS27\u2019s 608,000-mention split How Thai, Japanese, Taiwanese and Chinese star power captured social media, how a British front row and a high-street debut captured the newspapers, and what the gap between those two boards means after New York. Bright, Koji Mukai and Shuhua took the feed. Kelly Osbourne, Lila Moss and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":104280,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"blog-post-new-template.php","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"audience":[],"topic":[1335,518,1427],"region":[],"class_list":["post-104394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","topic-brand-reputation-management-en-gb","topic-social-listening-en-gb","topic-trending-en-gb"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104394"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104394\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":104406,"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104394\/revisions\/104406"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/104280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/audience?post=104394"},{"taxonomy":"topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?post=104394"},{"taxonomy":"region","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onclusive.com\/en-gb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/region?post=104394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}